Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Do All Students Receive the Same Chance?

I read a report titled A Question of Equality: Do All of My Students Receive the Same Chance? By Jonathan D. Haraty. This report is about a science teacher who teachers in a school where students often get into trouble as far as criminal problems. Recently, the school had to be changed from a high school plus minimal middle school to one building with separate sections. The teacher use to have to teach middle and high school but with the new reform, he only teachers high school with other new teachers now teaching middle school separate from high school. The teacher now has only fifteen students per class but most students have IEP’s and other learning disabilities. Another challenge this teacher has to face is the challenge of having several students out of class at a time due to court action and being “locked up”.
One student complains to him that her work is too easy and that her mother also agrees and they think that this will lead to her getting into trouble because she is not being challenged enough in school. The teacher started to look at his teaching more carefully. He was tending to gear his lessons to students who were at the remedial stage of learning. The teacher also had students that were learning English as their second language. This was also a problem because the school was trying a school-wide teaching method of using a lot of reading and writing assignments and activities in the classroom. Since this teacher had ESL Students, he had to slow down the pace for the rest of the class because of this. He noticed that many of his students that were completing their work and getting good grades were often looking out the window and distracting the other students during class. This was due to them being bored mentally. The teacher decided to do a survey with his classes. He figured by doing this, he could find out what the students felt was not challenging enough about the work. He then could interview them to find out what they need as individuals. The teacher told all of the students about the survey and explained to them what it was for, told them there was a consent form to sign for the survey and the interview, and explained that they did not have to do either if they did not want to. Also, the teacher explained that the survey and interview would in no way benefit or harm their grades.
The findings came out that during the one week period that the survey was given; only thirty-five percent of the students completed the survey. The teacher teaches grades nine through twelve and found out that the younger students were the ones who were most intrigued and interested to participate in the survey. Even more interesting, the students ended up saying that they wanted to keep up with the status quo that was already established meaning, they did not want anything in class to change. The students said the work was a good level for them and also none said it was too hard. Only two students said that sometimes in the past the work had been too easy. When asked how they would feel about getting more work to do, most students thought it would benefit them.
The discussion segment showed that the teacher was only able to interview two students. This was due to gang related problems. One student said that the reform helped her because before she felt she was not being pushed enough in her work, while now she feels the work is at a good level for her. Another student said that he doesn’t like extra work and that he shuts down when he has to do it. The teacher said that this student needs to pushed a little and that the work for him was not too hard. In the end, the teacher thinks that he has changed his teaching since the reform. Before the reform, he could easily differentiate lessons for students, but now, the reform makes that more difficult. How does one differentiate a reading lesson when the whole class is being read to out loud? Differentiation is something that the teacher would like to pursue more and plans to research more.
I thought from reading the title of this report that this report was going to be about students’ backgrounds and home life, and how it relates to how they do in school. I was surprised how I was completely wrong. However, I did feel that this was an interesting report. I can somewhat relate to it from the school in teach in. Although, I don’t have nearly as many problems and things to take into consideration with my students like this teacher had. I thought his findings were interesting. Many students did not participate due to gangs. Most of the students that did participate would not have an interview with the teacher.
In Maryland, we work in counties instead of small school districts. They have been talking about reforming schools especially in the middle schools. Reform can be good, but as we found out here, it can hurt the individual needs of our students, therefore forcing us to be more creative with developing work for these students.
Interesting article, what are your thoughts?

5 comments:

  1. It sounds to me like this situation is overwhelming for everyone. If students don't want change, is that necessarily a good thing. I wonder how much outreach they have done with parents. Overall, it sounds a bit hopeless in need of drastic intervention.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Boy does this bring up a lot of feelings and thoughts! I think of my daughter when I read this. No, she's not in trouble with the law - lol! She is actually a gifted student and she is often left feeling bored because the lessons are often tailored to the middle or lower levels within a class. Personally this angers me because my daughter, and other gifted students, are being left behind - yet another area NCLB gets wrong (daoes this bill get ANYTHING right?) Professionally it is frustrating as well. I know I get into terribly politically incorrect area when I say something like this but it makes me wonder if this wonderful nirvana of the "inclusive classroom" is really helping anyone? Heaven forbid we hurt someones self esteem but wouldn't all kids benefit if we admitted reality, admitted kids on different levels can learn if you teach to them and their abilities, and get these kids in seperate classrooms so the poor teacher doesn't have to struggle attempting to teach to so many abilities? It is a pretty sad statement to me when some of our worst behaved kids are the smartest kids and they are behaving poorly because they are bored.

    It also points out that so many of the issues facing school, especially in a situation as described above, are social issues, not purely educational issues. How on gods green earth could these kids - or anyone - come into school and care much less learn anything when they live in a world of gangs, drugs, violence, and apathy? I'm surprise any of these kids care. Government would be far better served scrapping NCLB completely and attacking the real problems with some kind of Social Marshall Plan. This teacher attempting to teach these kids is like putting up a 2 foot dike when a 12 foot wall of water is coming. The flood should be contained at it's source.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is the reason why there should be two levels to every class, AP and regular. I realize that regular is not a good name for it, but so be it. Students who do not want to challenge themselves should not take AP. Otherwise, if students are behind, they will need to catch up. Whatever happened to survival of the fittest? The students who try will have, and the students who need extra help but do not seek it will have not. I do not believe that a teacher should be overwhelmed with reaching every student. It is an impossible task and it wears down a teacher’s confidence and vitality.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As I read this blog I am reminded of how much teachers have to consider and adapt to relative to the school district where they teach. I think those of us from rural school districts don't feel the pressure of social problems, but we do feel other pressures.

    Regardless, I think we are seeing a time where standards are being lowered and more classroom content is being geared to the lowest common denominator, so at least some learning is taking shape. Perhaps, as one of the bloggers noted, we must continue to worked toward ways to offer AP and regular classes. To me it seems we spend a lot of money and time hoping to improve student learning for title and other students, but spend very little trying to challenge and improve the learning of the gifted students; who can be held back in regular classrooms.

    In the case of this school, there seems to be so many issues facing the students and the teacher that other reforms and options may need to be brought into play before any real progress will be achieved. I think we ask a lot of teachers, and overcoming parental, social and economic problems is potentially insurmountable. Still that doesn't mean we stop trying.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is so true. It seems we have had to start teaching from bottom-up and the top-down methodology is getting pushed to the wayside. It's extremely frustrating as a parent to watch a child struggle in a classroom of top students and vice versa as a teacher teaching the bottom students and not being able to provide the top students the challenges they deserve. I truly wonder if we will ever find the balance.

    ReplyDelete